Who Buys Your Megawatts, and Who Stands Behind the Lease
AI Infrastructure, Part 2 of 3
On October 25, Elon Musk wrote that “the 200+ neoclouds are going to see guppy-level death and consolidation. Some will make it through, but not many.” His reason was money: debt markets, he said, have nearly closed to AI companies without substantial revenue from somewhere else. Gartner had said much the same on October 14, predicting that more than 80% of GPU cloud providers will stop operating independently by 2030.
If you’re developing powered land for AI, that matters more than it sounds, because those GPU clouds are a large share of your likely tenants. You get asked two questions, usually in this order. Who will sign for your megawatts? And will a lender finance the lease once they do?
Over the past few weeks I mapped every AI data center lease I could find from 2024 to 2026 with a public number attached: about 30 of them, plus the debt behind them. I went in focused on the first question. I came out convinced the second one decides the first, and Musk’s warning is the reason.
Who is signing
Three kinds of tenants are taking powered capacity from outside developers today.
GPU clouds. These rent out chips to AI labs and hyperscalers, and most of them don’t own their buildings.
Fluidstack has leased close to a gigawatt from former bitcoin miners: Cipher in Texas, TeraWulf in New York and Hut 8 in Louisiana. It’s the vehicle for Anthropic’s $50 billion US build.
CoreWeave says its contracted capacity is “very largely leased,” across roughly 40 development partners.
Lambda leases from Aligned, EdgeConneX, Cologix and others.
TensorWave signed a 15-year lease for 222 MW, expandable past 650 MW, at Fermi America in Texas in August.
Chip and inference clouds.
Cerebras, now public with about $8.6 billion in cash, has signed 10-year, 40 MW leases with small developers in Alabama and Minnesota this year.
Together AI has more than 500 MW committed through partners.
DigitalOcean is adding sites 15 to 20 MW at a time.
The labs themselves.
Anthropic signed a 20-year, roughly $19 billion lease for about 400 MW with TeraWulf in Kentucky.
Riot and CleanSpark have each signed 20-year leases with tenants described only as a “frontier AI lab” or a “high investment-grade” technology company.
At the top end, the middleman is being skipped.
The question that decides the deal
Here’s what changed my thinking. Most GPU clouds can’t carry a 15-year lease on their own credit. They’re growing fast, spending heavily, and leaning on one or two customers. A lender won’t finance a building against that alone. Those are the guppies Musk means.
So in nearly every large deal, someone stronger stands behind the tenant:
Google backs Fluidstack’s leases at Cipher, TeraWulf and Hut 8, and takes warrants in the landlords in return.
Amazon’s parent company guarantees the rent on AWS’s lease at Cipher’s Stingray site, and covers cost overruns above a set cap.
AMD has the right to step in on a GPU cloud’s lease at Core Scientific.
Nvidia committed $6.3 billion to buy any capacity CoreWeave can’t sell, through 2032. It also guarantees $860 million of Nscale’s Texas leases. Press reports say it holds the lease on a Texas campus where Lambda serves Anthropic.
Once a backer like that is in place, the money follows. Signed leases are being financed at 80 to 90 percent of cost with bonds secured on the lease payments:
Typical coupon: about 6 to 7.75 percent.
Investment grade: Hut 8’s Louisiana bonds priced at 6.19 percent, rated BBB-, behind a Google-backed lease.
High end: Galaxy, whose tenant is CoreWeave, pays 9.875 percent.
The tenant decides whether you have a deal. The backer decides whether you can finance it, and at what price. In a shakeout, the backer also decides whether the tenant is still there in year five.
What the terms look like
Across the deals with disclosed numbers:
Terms have lengthened. The early GPU-cloud leases ran 10 years. Hyperscaler and Google-backed leases run 15. The direct lab deals run 20.
Rents have climbed with them. Most leases work out to roughly $1.65 to $1.9 million per IT megawatt per year, and the 20-year deals higher. Our arithmetic from disclosed contract values; structures differ, so treat these as a range.
Building costs run about $8 to $12 million per IT megawatt in what’s been disclosed.
The former bitcoin miners noticed first. They had the power, so they became the landlords. Now several are buying industrial power sites outright: TeraWulf bought a former aluminum smelter in Kentucky, and MARA agreed to buy a gas plant in Ohio.
What this means if you’re developing
Sell to the backer as much as to the tenant. Before you spend months on a letter of intent, find out who stands behind the company across the table, and whether that support extends to your site. A GPU cloud with a Google or Nvidia backstop is a different counterparty from one without, and if Musk is even half right, that difference is the whole deal.
Know your benchmark before the first call. Term, rent per megawatt, escalators, who pays for the fit-out, and what credit support is standard for that tenant are all now visible in public deals. You shouldn’t be learning them from the other side.
Know who has financed this exact structure. The same few arrangers and lenders keep appearing on these deals:
Arrangers: Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, MUFG and Barclays.
Lenders behind the GPUs: Upper90, Victory Park, Pimco, Blue Owl and Blackstone.
A lender that just financed a 15-year Google-backed lease will move faster on the next one.
What we do
This is the map we build for developers, one site at a time:
the tenants most likely to sign for that location and size;
who could stand behind them;
who has financed that kind of lease in the last 24 months, by name, with the person who led the deal.
If you’re developing powered land and want to see what that looks like for your market, I’m glad to send a sample.
— Jeff Laughlin, RCG International
Part 2 of 3. Previously: The Bottleneck Moved. Now It's the Building. Next: Stranded Compute, and Who Funds Powered Land Before There's a Tenant.
Sources: Musk’s posts on X (Oct 24–25, 2026), as reported by Yahoo Finance; Gartner (Oct 14, 2026); company releases and SEC filings (Cipher Digital, TeraWulf, Hut 8, Core Scientific, Applied Digital, Galaxy, Riot, CleanSpark, CoreWeave, Cerebras, Nscale S-1); DatacenterDynamics; Bloomberg; The Block; Data Center Frontier. Figures as of October 2026. Some deals are press reports not confirmed by the companies.